| |
Induction of chromosomal aberrations was studied from ¼ to 14 days
post irradiation in the bone marrow of mice treated or not treated
with Liv.52, a herbal preparation, prior to 4.5 Gy exposure. The frequency
of chromatid and chromosomal aberrations started increasing at day
¼ in the irradiated and Liv.52 + irradiated groups. The highest frequency
of aberrations was recorded at day ½ post exposure, which declined
after day 1 in both groups. The frequency of both types of aberrations
was significantly lower in the Liv.52 + irradiated group than in the
irradiated group.
Liv.52 is a non-toxic herbal preparation composed
of Capparis spinosa, Cichorium intybus, Solanum nigrum, Cassia
occidentalis, Terminalia arjuna, Achillea millefolium and Tamarix
gallica. It has been reported to be clinically effective in
treating hepatotoxicity and a wide range of hepatic disorders (Mathur,
1975; Sule et al., 1968; Deshpande et al. 1971). The
radioprotective potential of Liv.52 was demonstrated for the first
time in mice by Saini et al. (1984a, b) against radiation-induced
sickness, dermatitis and spleen injury. Recently, Jagetia and Ganapathi
(1989) have reported that prior administration of Liv.52 reduced
the formation of micronuclei in mouse bone marrow.
The present study was undertaken to elucidate the
protective action of Liv.52 against radiation-induced chromosomal
aberrations in bone marrow of mice exposed to 4.5 Gy of whole-body
g-radiation.
Male Swiss albino mice,
6-8 weeks old and weighing 26.9 ± 2.54 g, were selected from an
inbred colony maintained under controlled conditions of temperature
(23 ± 2°C), humidity (50 ± 5%) and light (10 and 14 h of light and
dark). The animals were given sterile food (wheat 70%, Bengal gram
20%, fishmeal 5%, yeast powder 4%, sesame oil 0.75% and shark liver
oil 0.25%) prepared in the laboratory and water ad libitum.
Throughout the experiment 5-6 animals were housed in a polypropylene
cage containing sterile paddy husk (procured locally) as bedding.
One group of animals
was fed orally (using 22 gauge oral feeding needles) with a 5% dextrose
solution once a day for 7 days before irradiation and served as
the control group, while the other mice received 500mg/kg b.wt.
of Liv.52 powder (supplied by The Himalaya Drug Company) in 5% dextrose
solution in a similar fashion. One hour after administration on
day 7, the animals of both groups were exposed to 4.5Gy of g-radiation
(Gammatron telecobalt therapy source) in specially designed well-ventilated
plastic boxes. The animals were irradiated in groups of 10 at a
dose rate 0.88 Gy/min., at a distance of 60 cm from the source (dosimetry
done by Dr. J.C.R. Solomon, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology,
K.M.C. Manipal). For comparison a few animals were also treated
with 5% dextrose and Liv.52 as above but without irradiation.
Animals from each group
were given 0.025% colchicine intraperitoneally 2 h before killing.
The animals from each group were killed by cervical dislocation
at ¼, ½, 1, 2, 3, 7 and 14 days post exposure. The femora were removed
and the metaphase plates were prepared by the usual cytogenetic
method. The slides were stained in 4% Giemsa at pH 6.8 The chromosomal
aberrations (chromatic and chromosomes) were scored on an AO Reichert
Microse at a magnification of 500 x. Four hundred metaphase plates
were scored from each animal and a total of 2000 metaphase plates
were scored for 5 animals at each post-irradiation time. The criteria
for scoring were based on the classification of Savage (1975).
The data were analysed
by the chi square test on an IBM computer.
The results are expressed as aberrations/100
cells. Liv.52 administration did not affect the control frequency
of aberrations (Table 1).
|
Table
1: Frequency of chromosomal aberrations in the bone marrow of
mice exposed to 4.5 Gy60 Co g rays with or without
Liv.52 treatment
|
|
Post-irradiation
time (days)
|
Treatment
|
Aberrant cells
|
Aberrations per
100 cells
|
Total aberrations
|
Polyploids (%)
|
Pulverization (%)
|
|
Chromatid breaks
|
Chromosome breaks
|
Centric rings
|
Dicentrics
|
Exchanges
|
Acentric fragments
|
|
Sham-irradiation
|
0.50 ± 0.07
|
0.10
|
0.00
|
0.10
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.50
|
0.70
|
0.15
|
0.00
|
|
Liv.52+Sham-irradiation
|
0.55 ± 0.09
|
0.15
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.60
|
0.80
|
0.10
|
0.00
|
|
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
|
¼
|
C
|
9.15 ± 0.58
|
0.90
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
12.35
|
13.25
|
0.00
|
0.70
|
|
E
|
7.25 ± 0.37
|
0.50
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
7.45
|
7.95
|
0.00
|
0.45
|
|
|
p <0.05
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
p <0.001
|
p <0.001
|
NS
|
NS
|
|
½
|
C
|
51.45 ± 6.00
|
11.05
|
4.05
|
2.65
|
4.20
|
1.30
|
123.25
|
146.50
|
0.55
|
2.65
|
|
E
|
26.45 ± 3.78
|
3.50
|
1.70
|
2.15
|
1.60
|
0.50
|
62.85
|
72.30
|
0.50
|
0.25
|
|
|
p <0.001
|
p <0.001
|
p <0.001
|
NS
|
p <0.001
|
p <0.01
|
p <0.001
|
p <0.001
|
NS
|
p <0.001
|
|
1
|
C
|
45.25 ± 3.32
|
3.50
|
5.00
|
5.35
|
0.60
|
1.15
|
81.80
|
97.40
|
1.95
|
3.35
|
|
E
|
24.40 ± 1.07
|
3.25
|
3.00
|
3.60
|
0.50
|
0.30
|
53.40
|
63.90
|
1.65
|
2.15
|
|
|
p <0.01
|
NS
|
p <0.01
|
p <0.01
|
NS
|
p <0.01
|
p <0.001
|
p <0.001
|
NS
|
p <0.05
|
|
2
|
C
|
11.25 ± 0.97
|
0.65
|
0.45
|
0.35
|
0.25
|
0.35
|
13.40
|
15.45
|
0.85
|
0.00
|
|
E
|
5.80 ± 0.76
|
0.20
|
0.35
|
0.20
|
0.05
|
0.05
|
7.50
|
8.35
|
0.60
|
0.00
|
|
|
p <0.001
|
p <0.05
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
p <0.05
|
p <0.001
|
p <0.001
|
NS
|
NS
|
|
3
|
C
|
7.10 ± 1.16
|
0.70
|
0.05
|
0.20
|
0.15
|
0.25
|
10.50
|
11.85
|
0.25
|
0.00
|
|
E
|
2.70 ± 0.28
|
0.10
|
0.05
|
0.05
|
0.05
|
0.05
|
3.80
|
4.10
|
0.20
|
0.00
|
|
|
p <0.001
|
p <0.01
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
p <0.001
|
p <0.001
|
NS
|
NS
|
|
7
|
C
|
3.05 ± 0.28
|
0.35
|
0.10
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
4.75
|
5.20
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
|
E
|
2.10 ± 0.30
|
0.10
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
3.70
|
3.80
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
|
|
p <0.05
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
p <0.05
|
NS
|
NS
|
|
14
|
C
|
2.80 ± 0.09
|
0.15
|
0.15
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.10
|
3.65
|
4.05
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
|
E
|
1.80 ± 0.25
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
3.35
|
3.35
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
|
|
p <0.05
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
|
C – irradiated group; E – Liv.52
+ irradiated group.
400 metaphases were scored/animal and 5 animals were used
for each group at each post exposure time.
|
The frequency of aberrant
cells increased from day ¼ reaching to a peak level on day ½ in
both the irradiated and Liv.52 + irradiated groups and declined
thereafter. The frequency of aberrant cells was significantly less
in the Liv.52 + irradiated group than in the irradiated group (Table
1).
Chromatid breaks were
seen at day ¼, which continued to increase up to day ½ and decline
thereafter. The normal levels were restored on days 14 and 2 in
the irradiated and Liv.52 + irradiated group respectively (Table
1).
Chromosome breaks,
centric rings, dicentrics and chromosome exchanges were observed
at day ½ post exposure in both groups. The frequency of chromosome
breaks and centric rings was highest on day 1, while that of dicentrics
and exchanges was highest on day ½ and declined thereafter. The
aberration frequency was always lower in the Liv.52 + irradiated
group than in the irradiated group (Table 1).
The highest frequency
of total aberrations was recorded on day ½ in both groups, thereafter
it declined continuously up to day 14 post irradiation. The percentage
of total aberrations was significantly lower in the Liv.52 + irradiated
group up to day 7 than in the irradiated group (Table 1).
Pulverized cells increased
from day ¼ and the highest number of these cells was recorded on
day 1; thereafter pulverized cells could not be observed. The frequency
of pulverized cells was significantly lower in the Liv.52 + irradiated
group than in the irradiated group (Table 1).
Liv.52 has been reported
to protect mice against radiation-induced sickness, dermatitis and
spleen injury (Saini et al, 1984a,b). The administration
of Liv.52 prior to irradiation resulted in a significant decline
in chromosomal aberrations (Table 1). The frequency of aberrant
cells was significantly lower in the Liv.52 + irradiated group than
in the irradiated group at all post-exposure time periods studied.
Gupta and Uma Devi (1985, 1986) and Thomas and Uma Devi (1987) have
also reported a decline in aberrant cells in mice treated with MPG
and WR-2721, singly or in combination, before exposure to g radiation.
Liv.52 was equally
effective in protecting the chromosomes against radiation-induced
damage, as is evidenced by the lower frequency of chromatic breaks,
chromosome breaks, centric rings, dicentrics, exchanges, acentric
fragments and total aberrations. Most of these aberrations had returned
to the normal level at day 3 post exposure in the Liv.52 + irradiated
group as compared to the irradiated group. These findings support
our earlier report on micronuclei, where the frequency of micronuclei
in the Liv.52 + irradiated mice returned to a normal level at day
3 post exposure (Jagetia and Ganapathi, 1989).
The frequency of pulverized
cells was always significantly lower in the drug-treated group than
in the irradiated group. This indicates that Liv.52 could protect
the cells against the severe infliction of radiation damage.
The exact mechanism
by which Liv.52 prevents chromosomal damage is not known. The depletion
of intracellular glutathione (GSH) has been reported to be one of
the causes of radiation-induced damage, while increased levels of
intracellular GSH are responsible for radioprotective action. A
similar mechanism of action may be attributed to the radioprotective
action of Liv.52, which has been reported to restore the intracellular
GSH level to normal in rats exposed to 4.0 Gy of g radiation (Sarkar
et al., 1989).
There is growing evidence
that double-strand breaks (dsb) are mainly responsible for the formation
of chromosomal aberrations (Natrajan et al., 1980; Bryant,
1988). It is possible that the elevated levels of GSH in the Liv.52-treated
group may be able to enhance the repair of dsb, lowering the frequency
of chromosomal aberrations in this group. This conclusion is supported
by the recent study of Ochi (1989) who has reported that chromosomal
aberrations were repaired only in GSH-positive cells.
We acknowledge with thanks
the financial support extended by The Himalaya Drug Company, to
carry out this work. The irradiation facilities provided by the
Head, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, KMC, Manipal are
thankfully acknowledged. We also wish to thank Mr. Harischandra
Nayak of Computer Department, KMC, Manipal for chi-square analysis.
- Bryant, P.E., Use of restriction endonucleases to study relationships
between DNA double-strand breaks, chromosomal aberrations and
other end-points in mammalian cells. Int. J. Radiat. Biol.
(1988): 54, 869.
- Desphande, R.S., Sheth, S.C. and Joykutty, M.D., Infectious
hepatitis study of 100 cases. Curr. Med. Pract.
(1971): 15, 810.
- Gupta, R. and Uma Devi, P. Protection against radiation-induced
chromosome injury by sulfhydryl compounds. Acta Radiol. Oncol.
(1985): 24, 419.
- Gupta, R. and Uma Devi, P., Protection against whole-body gamma
radiation by SH-compounds. Br. J. Radiol. (1986): 59, 625.
- Jagetia, G.C. and Ganapathi, N.G., Inhibition of clastogenic
effect of radiation by Liv.52 in the bone marrow of mice. Mutation
Res. (1989): 224, 507.
- Mathur, P.S., Some clinical observations on the use of Liv.52
(an indigenous drug) in case of cirrhosis of the liver in children.
Curr. Med. Pract. (1957): 1, 107.
- Natarajan, A.T., Obe, G., van Zeeland, A.A., Palitti, F., Meijers,
F. and Verdegaal-Immerzeel, E.A.M., Molecular mechanisms involved
in production of chromosome aberrations. II. Utilization of Neurospora
endonuclease for the study of aberration production by X-rays
in G1 and G2 stages of the cell cycle. Mutation
Res. (1980): 69, 293.
- Ochi, T., Effects of iron chelators and glutathione depletion
on the induction and repair of chromosomal aberrations by tert.-butyl
hydroperoxide in cultured Chinese hamster cells. Mutation Res.
(1989): 213, 243.
- Révész, L. Bergstrand, H. and Modig, H., Intrinsic non-protein
sulphydryl levels and cellular radiosensitivity. Nature
(London) (1963): 198, 1275.
- Saini, M.R., Kumar, S., Jagetia, G.C. and Saini, N., Effectiveness
of Liv.52 against radiation sickness and dermatitis. Ind. Practit.
(1984a): 37, 1133.
- Saini, M.R., Kumar, S., Jagetia, G.C. and Saini, N., Liv.52
protection against late effect of radiation on mammalian spleen.
Ind. Drugs (1984b): 21, 374.
- Sarkar, S.R., Singh, L.R., Uniyal, B.P. and Bhatnagar, V.S.,
Radioprotective effect of Liv.52 and tissue reduced glutathione
(GSH) in experimental rats. Probe (1989): 3, 191.
- Savage, J.R.K., Classification and relationships of induced
chromosomal structural changes. J. Med. Genet. (1975):
12, 103.
- Sule, C.R., Pai, V.R., Damania, R.F. et al., Studies
with Liv.52 therapy in infective hepatitis. J. Indian Med.
Prof. (1968): 14, 6391.
- Thomas, B. and Uma Devi, P., Chromosome protection by WR-2721
and MPG single and combination treatments. Strahlenther,
Oncol. (1987): 163, 807.
|
Liv.52 |